Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:30

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why did my ex move on so quickly?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What are the differences between INFJ-T and INFJ A?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the best video editing software you are using presently?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Panel approves changes to enhance the flow of the game in men’s basketball - NCAA.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Temu’s daily US users cut in half following end of ‘de minimis’ loophole - New York Post
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.